MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204637809 · doi:10.1113/jp281988

Short‐term ketone monoester supplementation improves cerebral blood flow and cognition in obesity: A randomized cross‐over trial

2021· article· en· W3204637809 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeremy J. Walsh, Hannah G. Caldwell, Helena Neudorf, Philip N. Ainslie, Jonathan P. Little

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsCerebral blood flowPlaceboMedicineKetone bodiesNeurocognitiveInternal medicineObesityBody mass indexDigit symbol substitution testCerebral perfusion pressureEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCognitionCardiologyEndocrinologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adults with obesity are at increased risk of neurocognitive impairments, partly as a result of reduced cerebral blood flow and brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Ketone supplements containing β‐hydroxybutyrate (β‐OHB) are a purported therapeutic strategy for improving brain health in at‐risk populations. We tested the hypothesis that short‐term β‐OHB supplementation will elevate cerebral blood flow and BDNF, as well as improve cognition in adults with obesity. In a placebo‐controlled double‐blind, cross‐over design, 14 adults with obesity (10 females; aged 56 ± 12 years; body mass index = 33.8 ± 6.9 kg m–2) consumed 30 mL (12 g) of β‐OHB or placebo thrice‐daily for 14 days. Blood flow (Q) and cerebrovascular conductance (CVC) were measured in the common carotid (CCA), internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral (VA) arteries by duplex ultrasound. BDNF was measured by an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Cognition was assessed by the digit‐symbol substitution (DSST), Stroop and task‐switching tests. Following 14 days of ketone supplementation, we observed significant improvements in cerebrovascular outcomes including QCCA (+12%), QVA (+11%), VACVC (+12%) and VA shear rate (+10%). DSST performance significantly improved following ketone supplementation (+2.7 correct responses) and improved DSST performance was positively associated improvements in cerebrovascular outcomes including QCCA, CCACVC, QVA and VACVC. By contrast to one hypothesis, β‐OHB did not impact fasting serum and plasma BDNF. β‐OHB supplementation improved cognition in adults with obesity, which may be partly facilitated by improvements in cerebral blood flow. β‐OHB supplementation was well‐tolerated and appears to be safe for cerebrovascular health, suggesting potential therapeutic benefits of β‐OHB in a population at risk of neurocognitive impairment. image Key points People with obesity are at increased risk of neurocognitive dysfunction, partly as a result of ‐induced reductions in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Ketone supplements containing β‐hydroxybutyrate (β‐OHB) reduce postprandial hyperglycaemia, which may increase CBF and BDNF, thereby protecting against obesity‐related cognitive dysfunction. We show for the first time that 14 days of thrice‐daily β‐OHB supplementation improves aspects of cognition and increases cerebrovascular flow, conductance and shear rate in the extracranial arteries of adults with obesity. Our preliminary data indicate a significant positive relationship between elevated CBF and improved cognition following β‐OHB supplementation. This trial provides a foundation for the potential non‐pharmacological therapeutic application of β‐OHB supplementation in patient groups at risk of hyperglycaemic cerebrovascular disease and cognitive dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207