MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204783925 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2021-0064

Early detection of onion neck rot disease in Manitoba

2021· article· en· W3204783925 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Poonam Singh, Faiz Ahmad, Vikram Bisht, Nevya Thakkar, Sumreen Sajjad

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGarlic and Onion Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentBrandon UniversityAssiniboine Community College
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsBulbBotrytisAlliumBiologyCultivarHorticultureAgronomyBotrytis cinerea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neck rot caused by the fungus Botrytis allii Munn. is one of the most devastating diseases of onions (Allium cepa L.), resulting in significant yield losses. This disease is latent in nature developing symptomless onion plants in the field with bulbs typically showing symptoms 1–2 months after harvest in the storage. Molecular studies were conducted to detect latent infections of Botrytis neck rot in the onion fields of Manitoba, Canada. Plant samples of onion cultivars ‘Redwing’ and ‘Pocono’ were collected every 10 days throughout the growing season, starting from planting until bulb harvesting during 2018, 2019, and 2020 from a research farm in Brandon, Manitoba, and plant samples of ‘Redwing’ were collected during 2019 and 2020 from a commercial vegetable farm in Portage La Prairie, Manitoba. The amplified DNA fragment of onion leaves and the neck region of collected samples were subjected to polymerase chain reaction using the Botrytis-specific primer pair BA2f/BA1r. Botrytis allii was detected on onion samples collected from the commercial farm as early as the end of June 2019 and 2020 when plants were at the 5–7 leaf stage. The majority of onion samples collected from the research farm also started testing positive for the pathogen from June (2019, 2020) and July (2018) onwards. This knowledge about the timing of infection in the field will be useful in helping farmers to develop and evaluate management strategies in the field, and also predict the storability and availability of quality bulbs for sale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicGarlic and Onion StudiesFrench-language works237,207