Effects of Shenfu injection on inflammatory factors and immune function in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) is a common infectious respiratory disease in pediatrics, and macrolide antibiotics are the optimal treatment option. In recent years, there is a significant increase in the resistance of this pathogen to macrolide antibiotics, which makes the clinical treatment of this disease increasingly complex. Shenfu injection (SFI), a herbal extract injection, has advantages of improving immune function, reducing inflammatory reaction, improving curative effect and shortening the course of disease in the treatment of pediatric MP. However, there is a lack of rigorous clinical studies to evaluate the effects of SFI on inflammatory factors and immune function in children with MP. METHODS: This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial protocol. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of SFI on inflammatory factors and immune function in children with MP. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either the treatment group (azithromycin + 100 mL 5% glucose injection + 50 mL SFI) or the control group (azithromycin + 150 mL 5% glucose injection). Patients in both groups received the standard treatment for 7 days. The levels of inflammatory factor indexes (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-α) and immune function indexes (immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin M) in both groups were measured at the beginning of treatment, on the 3rd day of treatment and at the end of treatment. Besides, the time of improvement in clinical symptoms (duration of cough, time of disappearance of lung rales, time of fever reduction, and time of disappearance of lung X-ray infiltrative shadow) and adverse effects in both groups were recorded. Finally, the data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software. DISCUSSION: In this study, an evaluation was conducted on the effects of SFI on inflammatory factors and immune function in pediatric MP. The results of this experiment will provide a clinical basis for the adjuvant treatment of pediatric MP with SFI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: OSF Registration number.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".