Le comité Witcihitisotan (entraide) : un espace de soutien pour les familles autochtones en ville
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the process and contributions of the Witcihitisotan committee (mutual help in Atikamekw), implemented by parents of teenagers in a Native Friendship Center in Quebec. To this day, adequate forms of support for Indigenous adolescent families remain under-documented, which represents a gap, considering the particular issues experienced by Aboriginal youth in urban areas. Analysis of the documents from 14 months of the committee's meetings showed three interdependent and complementary forms of support: the committee meetings allow parents to “express” themselves (to exchange and share advice); to “engage” with one another (to listen to each other to help on the path towards healing); and to “envision” their community living their culture in the city. Implementing an approach similar to that of storytelling, the committee offers an intergenerational place to appreciate, strengthen and heal, providing for the collective learning of families towards the (re)appropriation of parenting skills and community wellbeing. The opportunity to come together in an emotionally and culturally safe place is an integral part of the strength-based decolonizing approach. This case study demonstrates the importance of fostering peer support and having a collective space that is responsive to the needs of the group. This type of initiative helps in improving parent-youth relationships and better communication and self-awareness, which would be unattainable with the often predetermined and deficit-based approaches brought in by outside experts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".