Perturbation Theory-Aided Learned Digital Back-Propagation Scheme for Optical Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Derived from the regular perturbation treatment of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, a machine learning-based scheme to mitigate the intra-channel optical fiber nonlinearity is proposed. Referred to as the perturbation theory-aided (PA) learned digital back propagation (LDBP), the proposed scheme constructs a deep neural network (DNN) in a way similar to the split-step Fourier method: linear and nonlinear operations alternate. Inspired by the perturbation analysis, the intra-channel cross phase modulation term is conveniently represented by matrix operations in the DNN. The introduction of this term in each nonlinear operation considerably improves the performance, as well as enables the flexibility of PA-LDBP by adjusting the numbers of spans per step. The proposed scheme is evaluated by numerical simulations of a single-carrier optical fiber communication system operating at 32 Gbaud with 64-quadrature amplitude modulation and 20 × 80 km transmission distance. The results show that the proposed scheme achieves approximately 1 dB, 1.2 dB, 1.2 dB, and 0.5 dB performance gain in terms of${\it Q}$factor over LDBP, when the numbers of spans per step are 1, 2, 4, and 10, respectively. Two methods are proposed to reduce the complexity of PA-LDBP, i.e., pruning the number of perturbation coefficients and chromatic dispersion compensation in the frequency domain for multi-span per step cases. Investigation of the performance and complexity suggests that PA-LDBP attains improved performance gains with reduced complexity when compared to LDBP in the cases of 4 and 10 spans per step.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".