Patterns of surface energy exchange and evapotranspiration in relation to water availability in an oasis-desert ecotone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A knowledge of the exchanges of energy and water over the terrestrial surface is the first step to understand the ecohydrological mechanisms, particularly in water-limited ecosystems in the dryland environments. However, patterns of energy exchange and evapotranspiration (ET) are not well understood in the oasis-desert ecotone, which plays an important role in protecting oasis against the threat of desertification in northwestern China’s arid regions. Here the continuous measurements of surface energy fluxes were made using eddy covariance in conjunction with auxiliary measurements for two years (2014-2015) at a shrubland within an oasis-desert ecotone in the arid regions, northwestern China. Statistical analysis on 30-min time scale indicates that about 50% of daytime net radiation (Rn) over the shrubland is dissipated as H on average, which peaks in spring; one third Rn is consumed by soil heat flux (G). Only 9% of Rn was consumed for latent heat flux (λE), which peaks in summer (21% in 2014 and 16% in 2015), corresponding to the season with highest rainfall among all seasons. Daily mean ET is about 1 mm·d−1 during growing season of the shrub species. The rapid and transient increase in ET occurs following a rainfall event. A switch in surface soil moisture from 0.04 to 0.11 m3·m−3 causes an increase in Rn by about 11% and λE by 151% at the shrubland, respectively. Accumulated annual ET were 195 and 181 mm in 2014 and 2015, respectively, exceeding the corresponding P by about 87 and 77 mm, indicating that groundwater may be another important source of water for ET over the shrubland aside from P. These results provide valuable insight into the mechanisms of sustaining energy and water balance at the ecotone, and then produce some management guidelines for allocating water resources and protecting vegetation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".