MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205520250 · doi:10.1364/optica.439286

Quantitative super-resolution solid immersion microscopy via refractive index profile reconstruction

2021· article· en· W3205520250 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationRussian Science FoundationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOpticsMicroscopyTerahertz radiationRefractive indexInverse problemMicroscopeMaterials scienceDiffractionLens (geology)PhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid Immersion (SI) microscopy is a modern imaging modality that overcomes the Abbe diffraction limit and offers novel applications in various branches of visible, infrared, terahertz, and millimeter-wave optics. Despite the widespread use, SI microscopy usually results in qualitative imaging. Indeed, it presents only the raw distributions (in the image plane) of the backscattered field intensity, while unlocking the information about the physical properties of an imaged object, such as its complex refractive index (RI) distribution, requires resolving the inverse problem and remains a daunting task. In this paper, a method for resolving the SI microscopy inverse problem is developed, capable of reconstructing the RI distribution at the object imaging plane with subwavelength spatial resolution, while performing only intensity measurements. The sample RI is retrieved via minimization of the error function that characterizes discrepancy between the experimental data and the predictions of analytical model. This model incorporates all the key features of the electromagnetic-wave interaction with the SI lens and an imaged object, including contributions of the evanescent and ordinary-reflected waves, as well as effects of light polarization and wide beam aperture. The model is verified numerically, using the finite-element frequency-domain method, and experimentally, using the in-house reflection-mode continuous-wave terahertz SI microscope. Spatial distributions of the terahertz RIs of different low-absorbing optical materials and highly absorbing biological objects were studied and compared to a priori known data to demonstrate the potential of the novel SI microscopy modality. Given the linear nature of the Maxwell’s equations, the developed method can be applied for subwavelength-resolution SI microscopy at other spectral ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it