MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205621463 · doi:10.1111/imm.13422

A specialist antigen storage compartment in dendritic cells to sustain cross‐presentation

2021· letter· en· W3205621463 on OpenAlexaff
Vuk Cerovic, Simon Milling

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsImmune systemImmunologyCross-presentationAcquired immune systemAntigen presentationDendritic cellBiologyAntigenAntigen-presenting cellImmunogenicityLymphatic systemAutoimmunityFollicular dendritic cellsT cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dendritic cells (DCs) play a key role in inducing, shaping and maintaining adaptive immune responses. DCs act as professional antigen-presenting cells, uniquely able to prime the differentiation of naive T cells. DCs reside in all tissues of the body, collecting antigen for transport to the local draining lymph nodes and for presentation to a hugely diverse repertoire of T cells that recirculate between the blood and lymphoid organs. Crucially, DCs are capable of integrating signals from the tissue environment and instructing the development of appropriate T-cell responses. Thus, DCs represent a key link between the sensing of innate immune stimuli and the initiation of adaptive immune responses [1], as well as a means of transporting antigen from the periphery to inductive lymphoid compartments. Due to their central role in the regulation of immune responses, DCs represent a highly promising target for the development of immunological therapies. For example, in the fight against infectious disease, dendritic cell vaccination is capable of promoting increased immunogenicity of vaccines, especially in combination with other therapies [2]. Conversely, the functional plasticity of DCs also allows for the suppression of specific deleterious immune responses. Harnessing the tolerogenic potential of DCs can open up new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, autoimmunity or allergy [3, 4]. Thus, efforts to study and understand DC biology remain at the forefront of medical, immunological and infectious disease research. A functional property of DCs that has generated particular interest for its therapeutic potential is their capacity for cross-presentation. Cross-presentation can be defined as the presentation of exogenous antigen on MHC class I to CD8+ T cells. This is a key step in the priming of effector CD8+ T cells, including cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), which are critical in the defence against intracellular pathogens, notably viruses, as well as in anti-tumour responses. In particular, a subset of DCs referred to as DC1 [5] have been shown to have a propensity for efficient cross-presentation, which appear to be evolutionarily conserved across multiple species [6]. Therefore, there is considerable interest in understanding how to target particular antigens for cross-presentation by DCs in order to generate antigen-specific antiviral and anti-tumour CTL responses. In this issue of Immunology, we present new research from Ho and colleagues [7], which characterizes the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in antigen cross-presentation by DCs. Using fluorescent labelling and subcellular microscopy, the authors demonstrate antigen, in the form of immune complexes, can be detected in internal DC compartments after only 15 minutes of incubation. Highly efficient cross-presentation by DCs is then detected as early as 2h after antigen delivery. Crucially, the antigen is retained by DCs for at least 48h, allowing for continued cross-presentation to CD8+ T cells. Notably, the storage of antigen at early and late time-points appears to be handled by distinct subcellular compartments, which differ in terms of expression of several markers, as well as their distribution within the DC. The long-term storage compartments show expression of the lysosomal marker LAMP-1 and have a characteristic perinuclear localization. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that targeting of antigen to a different initial uptake pathway (via C-type lectin) still results in the long-term storage of antigen in the same LAMP-1+ compartments. Interestingly, the authors detect no role for cathepsin S in the processing of internalized antigen for cross-presentation but suggest a hitherto uncharacterized role for cathepsin X in the process. Additionally, the authors find high expression of cathepsin X in the DC1 subset, further emphasizing its likely importance in cross-presentation. This new research may enable antigen to be targeted specifically to this LAMP-1+ compartment, and may therefore allow for long-term storage and extended cross-presentation of the antigen to CD8+ T cells. Combined with immunogenic stimuli, this could lead to a novel therapeutic approach to generating long-lasting and protective CTL responses against viral or tumour antigens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207