Use of Oblique RGB Imagery and Apparent Surface Area of Plants for Early Estimation of Above-Ground Corn Biomass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimating above-ground biomass in the context of fertilization management requires the monitoring of crops at early stages. Conventional remote sensing techniques make use of vegetation indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), but they do not exploit the high spatial resolution (ground sampling distance < 5 mm) now achievable with the introduction of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in agriculture. The aim of this study was to compare image mosaics to single images for the estimation of corn biomass and the influence of viewing angles in this estimation. Nadir imagery was captured by a high spatial resolution camera mounted on a UAV to generate orthomosaics of corn plots at different growth stages (from V2 to V7). Nadir and oblique images (30° and 45° with respect to the vertical) were also acquired from a zip line platform and processed as single images. Image segmentation was performed using the difference color index Excess Green-Excess Red, allowing for the discrimination between vegetation and background pixels. The apparent surface area of plants was then extracted and compared to biomass measured in situ. An asymptotic total least squares regression was performed and showed a strong relationship between the apparent surface area of plants and both dry and fresh biomass. Mosaics tended to underestimate the apparent surface area in comparison to single images because of radiometric degradation. It is therefore conceivable to process only single images instead of investing time and effort in acquiring and processing data for orthomosaic generation. When comparing oblique photography, an angle of 30° yielded the best results in estimating corn biomass, with a low residual standard error of orthogonal distance (RSEOD = 0.031 for fresh biomass, RSEOD = 0.034 for dry biomass). Since oblique imagery provides more flexibility in data acquisition with fewer constraints on logistics, this approach might be an efficient way to monitor crop biomass at early stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".