MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205746873 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2021.57020

Optimization and Reform of Talent Training Scheme for Engineering Majors Under the Background of Engineering Certification

2021· article· en· W3205746873 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenyu Zheng, Liying Xing, Gengmin Jiang, Jun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHuman Resource and Talent Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationProfessional certification (computer technology)Engineering educationHealth systems engineeringContext (archaeology)EngineeringEngineering managementQuality (philosophy)Training (meteorology)Professional developmentTraining systemEngineering ethicsManagementMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advancement of science and technology, the modern industry is advocating higher requirements for the education of engineering professionals. Engineering education (EE), an important part of higher education, has played an important role in providing our country with quality engineering majors. Engineering certification is an important tool and foundation for improving the quality of engineering training and engineering professional training. Finding engineering experts suitable for the development trend of the new industrial road under the guidance of the certification standards for professional EE is an important task of EE in our country. The purpose of this thesis is to study the optimization and reform of the training program for engineering professionals under the background of engineering certification. In this article, in the context of engineering certification, we use literature research methods, comparative research methods, and system analysis methods to study engineering professional talent training programs. The results of the empirical analysis show that the engineering professional talent training program under the background of engineering certification emphasizes the application of EE in the talent training model, improving theory and practice, school-enterprise alliance, social development, technological progress, demand attraction and persistence of market feedback , And adhere to the principles of the system. It has formed an innovative model of talent training for optimization, stability and continuous improvement of engineering professionals. This will improve the implementation framework of modern engineering training strategies adapted to the actual development of EE in our country. To implement the effective operation of the framework, the training of modern behavioral engineers has laid the foundation for smooth training and created convenient conditions. Under the guidance of engineering qualifications, 80% of vocational colleges can guarantee the quality of education of engineering professionals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicHuman Resource and Talent ManagementFrench-language works237,207