MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205782932 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2021.3121194

Time-Domain Coupling Model for Nonparallel Frequency-Dependent Overhead Multiconductor Transmission Lines Above Lossy Ground

2021· article· en· W3205782932 on OpenAlexafffund
Manuja Gunawardana, Ashley Ng, Behzad Kordi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsElectric power transmissionTransmission lineOverhead (engineering)Time domainLossy compressionTransient (computer programming)Electronic engineeringFrequency domainTransmission (telecommunications)Coupling (piping)Nonlinear systemEngineeringComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisElectrical engineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expansion of power grids has resulted in the construction of multiple transmission lines within constrained spaces inevitably making them nonuniform in nature. Existing transmission line models available in electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulators are based on classical multiconductor transmission line (MTL) theory with the assumption that the transmission lines are infinitely long and have uniform cross-sectional dimensions. This paper develops a time-domain model, namely dispersive scattered field transmission line (DSFTL) model, for multiconductor dispersive nonuniform overhead transmission lines above lossy, frequency-dependent ground. The proposed model which consists of closed-form equations in the time-domain has been implemented using a modified finite-difference time-domain (MFDTD) algorithm and integrated into an EMT simulator (PSCAD/EMTDC). Results have been compared with and verified by those obtained using a full-wave approach and measured data available in the literature. Simulations of nonuniform structures that include nonlinear components (such as breakers) have also been carried out under fault conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207