MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205844682 · doi:10.1111/ijfs.15400

Desalted duck egg white nanogels combined with κ‐carrageenan as stabilisers for food‐grade Pickering emulsion

2021· article· en· W3205844682 on OpenAlexaff
Jingyun Zhao, Yalei Dai, Jin Gao, Qianchun Deng, Chuyun Wan, Bin Li, Bin Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPickering emulsionEmulsionThixotropyChemistryCarrageenanEgg whiteChemical engineeringMaterials scienceFood scienceOrganic chemistryComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary There was an extensive interest in food‐grade Pickering emulsions formulated by natural stabilisers owing to the gradual growing demand for pursuing green‐label products. Based on this, the desalted duck egg white nanogels (DEWN) combined with κ‐carrageenan (CAR) (CAR/DEWN) were used as stabilisers to prepare environment‐friendly Pickering emulsions. The DEWN and CAR/DEWN as well as the particles‐stabilised emulsions were all characterised. Compared with the DEWN‐ and CAR‐stabilised emulsions, Pickering emulsions based on CAR/DEWN were investigated to illustrate the long‐term stability according to the results of visual appearance, static multiple light scattering and centrifugation experiments. In addition, CAR/DEWN could prepare stable high internal phase emulsions, which may give a new perspective for nutraceutical or drug encapsulation and delivery. Adding CAR to the DEWN not only increased the apparent viscosity of the emulsions to 122.2% but also enhanced the thixotropic recovery rate to 87.7%. In general, CAR/DEWN as stabilisers significantly promoted the Pickering emulsions' properties, and provided a possibility for the application of Pickering emulsion in foods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food Science & TechnologySame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207