MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205867138 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00791

Correction to Thermochemistry of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reagents and its Implications

2021· review· en· W3205867138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rishi G. Agarwal, Catherine F. Wise, Jeffrey J. Warren, James M. Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryPacific Northwest National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesDivision of Graduate EducationU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsThermochemistryChemistryProtonReagentElectron transferComputational chemistryInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryNuclear physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of the article contained erroneously derived values of C G and related thermochemical constants in Table 1.C G is the constant used to convert reduction potentials and pK a values into Bond Dissociation Free Energies (BDFEs).The errors were due to an improper correction of the standard state for H • in solution from unit mole fraction (χ = 1) to 1 molar.For a detailed description of the correct derivation, we refer readers to Section S5 of our recent J. Am.Chem.Soc.article. 1 Reproduced below is a new version of Table 1 which includes corrected values of the thermochemical constants.The differences between the original and corrected C G values (ΔC G ) are given in the second column of the table; the corrections range from 2 to 5 kcal mol -1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0060.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207