Exploring Passengers’ Dependency Variety on Stations’ Functions in Urban Subway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urban subway is taken by people in different frequencies, thus leading them to present different dependency varieties on this mode. Yet, how those passengers who possess low dependency on urban subway travel is less investigated. Under this background, we propose a framework to uncover passengers’ dependency variety on stations’ functions in urban subway. To begin with, nine features regarding travel frequency and time are extracted from 100 million transaction records generated by 11.45 million passengers in a month. Thus, their travel dependency on urban subway is quantified. These features are clustered into 5 distinct levels via the k-means algorithm, before an inference of subway stations’ functions from 236,040 POI data sources via the LDA approach. In this way, passengers’ travel purposes can be identified. How passengers with different dependency levels behave in subway stations in space and time is further explored in a visualization way. The intuitive experimental results, validated by priori user experiences and land-use plan of Beijing, show that among the 5 levels of dependency varieties, passengers in the first two groups present a relatively strong dependency on urban subway. Meanwhile, passengers in the rest three groups possess a low dependency on urban subway and display extreme travel patterns in time and frequency, greatly increasing management difficulties for transit operators. Findings in this research help distinguish passengers with low levels of subway dependency and grasp how those passengers without striking dependency travel by subway and what for so that practitioners can conduct an accurate risk assessment on them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".