MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205945440 · doi:10.15278/isms.2021.fb11

CONFORMATIONAL LANDSCAPES OF 2-FUROIC ACID MONOMERS AND DIMERS BY ROTATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY AND DFT CALCULATIONS

2021· article· en· W3205945440 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Yang, Yunjie Xu, Wolfgang Jäger, Fan Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimerChemistryMonomerSpectroscopyRotational spectroscopyComputational chemistryMoleculePhysicsPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2-furoic acid (FA), a heterocyclic carboxylic acid, is a significant precursor of esters, acrylic chloride, and acid anhydride, and is often used for medical purpose, for example in an orally active antidiabetic vanadyl complex.1 FA monomer may exist in a number of possible conformations based on the orientation of the COOH group with the ring O atom and on the relative orientation of the C=O and OH in the COOH group. Some of these possible conformations were investigated before.2 In this work, we studied conformational landscapes of the FA monomer and dimer by using a chirped pulse Fourier transform microwave (FTMW) spectrometer and DFT calculations. Conformational searches were performed to identify possible conformations using a conformer-rotamer ensemble sampling tool (CREST).3 The resulting candidates were further optimized at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP level of theory. Three FA conformers and four (FA)2 conformers 2-furoic acid dimers were predicted. Experimentally, rotational spectra of three monomeric conformers and two binary conformers were assigned. Two other FA dimers predicted have zero electric dipole moments. Detailed analyses of the double proton tunneling motion and conformational conversion barriers will also be presented.\n\n\n\n1 M. Yin, X. Lei, M. Li, L. Yuan, J. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2006, 67, 1372-1378. 2 A. Halasa, L. Lapinski, I. Reva, H. Rostkowska, R. Fausto, M. J. Nowak, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2015, 119, 1037-1047; H. Ghalla, N. Issaoui, M. V. Castillo, S. A. Brandán, H. T. Flakus, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc, 2014, 121, 623-631. 3 S. Grimme, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2019, 15, 2847-2862.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Molecular SpectroscopySame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207