MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205974572 · doi:10.1177/13623613211052108

Caregiver strain among North American parents of children from the Autism Treatment Network Registry Call-Back Study

2021· article· en· W3205974572 on OpenAlex
Olivia J. Lindly, Amy M. Shui, Noa M Stotts, Karen Kuhlthau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAutism · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMaternal and Child Health BureauNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality
KeywordsAutismWorryFeelingPsychologyCaregiver stressSocial isolationPopulationAutism spectrum disorderClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryMedicineAnxietyDiseaseSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated caregiver strain is common and linked to poor health in parents of children with autism. Yet, little research has examined caregiver strain longitudinally and in geographically diverse samples of parents whose children have autism. This study aimed to (1) examine change in caregiver strain and (2) determine correlates of improved caregiver strain in North American parents of children with autism. This was a secondary analysis of data from the Autism Treatment Network Registry Call-Back Study, conducted from 2015 to 2017 on a random sample of children with autism spectrum disorder at 12 clinical sites in the United States or Canada. Child assessments and parent-reported questionnaires were completed at two time points 1 year apart. Caregiver strain was assessed with the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire. In total, 368 children had caregiver strain data at both times. Mean caregiver strain in parents did not significantly change between Times 1 and 2 (mean difference = 0.05, t(360) = 0.1, p = 0.92). Improved caregiver strain between Times 1 and 2 was associated with improved child adaptive functioning and externalizing problem behaviors. Caregiver strain was persistent and multi-factorial. Parent training to manage challenging child behaviors and adaptively cope may benefit this vulnerable parent population. Lay abstract Caregiver strain is the adverse impact that parents of children with emotional and behavioral issues including autism often experience (e.g. negative consequences of caregiving such as financial strain and social isolation; negative feelings that are internal to the caregiver such as worry and guilt; and negative feelings directed toward the child such as anger or resentment). This study showed that on average caregiver strain did not significantly change in North American parents of children with autism during a 2-year period. Improved caregiver strain was linked to improved child functioning and behavior. Routine assessment of caregiver strain and referral to evidence-based programming and supports may help alleviate some of the burden that families of children with autism commonly experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it