MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18667: Lipoprotein(a) Catabolism and Apolipoprotein(a) Secretion is Regulated by Sortilin

2015· article· en· W3205985798 on OpenAlexaff
Rocco Romagnuolo, Matthew Gemin, Marlys L. Koschinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternalizationLDL receptorApolipoprotein BPCSK9CatabolismEndocytosisKexinLipoproteinReceptorProprotein convertaseSecretionInternal medicineEndocrinologyCell biologyBiologyBiochemistryMedicineCholesterolMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in plasma have been identified as an independent, causal risk factor for coronary heart disease. Lp(a) consists of a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle whose apolipoproteinB-100 (apoB-100) moiety is covalently linked to the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Recently, Lp(a) internalization by the LDL-receptor (LDLr) in hepatic cells and primary human fibroblasts has been shown to be regulated by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). However, Lp(a)/apo(a) internalization still occurs even with a defective LDLr or in the presence of PCSK9 (in fibroblasts and hepatic cells, respectively), indicating a role for receptors other than the LDLr in Lp(a) catabolism. Hepatic sortilin has been identified as a potential receptor mediating LDL catabolism as well as the regulation of apoB-100 secretion. Sortilin localizes to the Golgi apparatus where it mediates trafficking of specific bound ligands to the lysosome. Sortilin also localizes to clathrin-coated pits in the plasma membrane where it can act as an internalization receptor. We demonstrate in the current study that Lp(a), but not apo(a), internalization in hepatic cells is influenced by sortilin overexpression. In the presence of PCSK9, Lp(a) internalization greatly increases with sortilin overexpression compared to control. These results suggest that hepatic sortilin has the ability to act as a receptor for Lp(a) catabolism, through the LDL-like moiety, in a manner that is not dependent on the LDLr. Furthermore, Lp(a) internalization increases with sortilin overexpression in primary human fibroblasts with a defective LDLr, again emphasizing an LDLr-independent role for sortilin as a receptor for Lp(a). Interestingly, an increase in apo(a) secretion is observed with sortilin overexpression in hepatic cells. Removal of the carboxyl-terminal tail of sortilin results in an inability to promote the secretion of apo(a), indicating a direct role for the sorting motifs present in this region of sortilin for the regulation of apo(a) secretion. Taken together, these results indicate novel roles for sortilin in both Lp(a) catabolism and apo(a) secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→