Identification of Genetic Signature Associated With Aging in Pulmonary Fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Aging is a strong risk factor and an independent prognostic factor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In this study, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis based on gene expression profiles for the role of aging in pulmonary fibrosis. Method: Four datasets (GSE21411, GSE24206, GSE47460, and GSE101286) for patients with clinical IPF and one dataset for bleomycin (BLM)-induced pulmonary fibrosis (BIPF) mouse model (GSE123293) were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). According to different age ranges, both patients with IPF and BIPF mice were divided into young and aged groups. The differently expressed genes (DEGs) were systemically analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) functional, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and hub genes analysis. Finally, we verified the role of age and core genes associated with age in vivo . Results: Via the expression profile comparisons of aged and young patients with IPF, we identified 108 aging-associated DEGs, with 21 upregulated and 87 downregulated. The DEGs were associated with “response to glucocorticoid,” “response to corticosteroid,” and “rhythmic process” in GO biological process (BP). For KEGG analysis, the top three significantly enriched KEGG pathways of the DEGs included “IL-17 signaling pathway,” “Mineral absorption,” and “HIF-1-signaling pathway.” Through the comparisons of aged and young BIPF mice, a total number of 778 aging-associated DEGs were identified, with 453 genes increased and 325 genes decreased. For GO and KEGG analysis, the DEGs were enriched in extracellular matrix (ECM) and collagen metabolism. The common DEGs of patients with IPF and BIPF mice were enriched in the BP category, including “induction of bacterial agglutination,” “hyaluronan biosynthetic process,” and “positive regulation of heterotypic cell-cell adhesion.” We confirmed that aged BIPF mice developed more serious pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, the four aging-associated core genes ( Slc2a3, Fga, Hp , and Thbs1 ) were verified in vivo . Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the impact of aging on pulmonary fibrosis. We also identified four aging-associated core genes ( Slc2a3, Fga, Hp , and Thbs1 ) related to the development of pulmonary fibrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".