MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Composite Hydrogel Bioinks for the Development of 3D Bioprinted Head and Neck in Vitro Tumor Models

2021· article· en· W3206169478 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Higher EducationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFaculty of Engineering, McGill UniversityChina Scholarship CouncilNational University of Defense TechnologyCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Institutes of HealthConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsDecellularizationExtracellular matrixSelf-healing hydrogelsHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaIn vivoMaterials science3D cell cultureBiomedical engineeringTumor microenvironmentTissue engineeringBiophysicsIn vitroChemistryCancer researchCancerHead and neck cancerBiochemistryBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reinforced extracellular matrix (ECM)-based hydrogels recapitulate several mechanical and biochemical features found in the tumor microenvironment (TME) in vivo. While these gels retain several critical structural and bioactive molecules that promote cell–matrix interactivity, their mechanical properties tend toward the viscous regime limiting their ability to retain ordered structural characteristics when considered as architectured scaffolds. To overcome this limitation characteristic of pure ECM hydrogels, we present a composite material containing alginate, a seaweed-derived polysaccharide, and gelatin, denatured collagen, as rheological modifiers which impart mechanical integrity to the biologically active decellularized ECM (dECM). After an optimization process, the reinforced gel proposed is mechanically stable and bioprintable and has a stiffness within the expected physiological values. Our hydrogel’s elastic modulus has no significant difference when compared to tumors induced in preclinical xenograft head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) mouse models. The bioprinted cell-laden model is highly reproducible and allows proliferation and reorganization of HNSCC cells while maintaining cell viability above 90% for periods of nearly 3 weeks. Cells encapsulated in our bioink produce spheroids of at least 3000 μm2 of cross-sectional area by day 15 of culture and are positive for cytokeratin in immunofluorescence quantification, a common marker of HNSCC model validation in 2D and 3D models. We use this in vitro model system to evaluate the standard-of-care small molecule therapeutics used to treat HNSCC clinically and report a 4-fold increase in the IC50 of cisplatin and an 80-fold increase for 5-fluorouracil compared to monolayer cultures. Our work suggests that fabricating in vitro models using reinforced dECM provides a physiologically relevant system to evaluate malignant neoplastic phenomena in vitro due to the physical and biological features replicated from the source tissue microenvironment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it