Bibliographic record
Abstract
◉ Purpose : The purpose of this study utilizing a fairy tales through the development of a program to perform occupational performance and visual perception with intellectual disabilities at－improved is investigated. ◉ Methods : Visual-perception problems with intellectual disabilities showing 10-year-old man with the consent of parents for children with a total of 15 session, three times a week, 30 minutes, 1 : 1 for utilizing fairy tale - the training was perceived. As for the pre and post program evaluation exercise - Late check-3 (Motor-Free visual perception test-3 ; MVPT-3) was used, performance assessment tasks in order to measure the Canadian Operations (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure : COPM) was used ◉ Results : The children’s fairy tales over the city - through perception training raw score 28 points to 33, ages 6 months to 6 years to 6months to 9 years has improved. ◉ Conclusion : When utilizing fairy tale - the intellectual disabilities with children through training, day to facilitate visual perceptual functions could be seen that effect. In the control group through collective research program is needed to prove a generalization of the will feed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".