A High-throughput Parallel Viterbi Algorithm via Bitslicing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we present a novel bitsliced high-performance Viterbi algorithm suitable for high-throughput and data-intensive communication. A new column-major data representation scheme coupled with the bitsliced architecture is employed in our proposed Viterbi decoder that enables the maximum utilization of the parallel processing units in modern parallel accelerators. With the help of the proposed alteration of the data scheme, instead of the conventional bit-by-bit operations, 32-bit chunks of data are processed by each processing unit. This means that a single bitsliced parallel Viterbi decoder is capable of decoding 32 different chunks of data simultaneously. Here, the Viterbi’s Add-Compare-Select procedure is implemented with our proposed bitslicing technique, where it is shown that the bitsliced operations for the Viterbi internal functionalities are efficient in terms of their performance and complexity. We have achieved this level of high parallelism while keeping an acceptable bit error rate performance for our proposed methodology. Our suggested hard and soft-decision Viterbi decoder implementations on GPU platforms outperform the fastest previously proposed works by and , achieving 21.41 and 8.24 Gbps on Tesla V100, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it