Multiple roles of GluN2D-containing NMDA receptors in short-term potentiation and long-term potentiation in mouse hippocampal slices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The GluN2 subunits of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are key drivers of synaptic plasticity in the brain, where the particular GluN2 composition endows the NMDAR complex with distinct pharmacological and physiological properties. Compared to GluN2A and GluN2B subunits, far less is known about the role of the GluN2D subunit in synaptic plasticity. In this study, we have used a GluN2C/2D selective competitive antagonist, UBP145, in combination with a GluN2D global knockout (GluN2D KO) mouse line to study the contribution of GluN2D-containing NMDARs to short-term potentiation (STP) and long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 region of mouse hippocampal slices. We made several distinct observations: First, GluN2D KO mice have higher levels of LTP compared to wild-type (WT) mice, an effect that was occluded by blockade of GABA receptor-mediated inhibition or by using a strong LTP induction protocol. Second, UBP145 partially inhibited LTP in WT but not GluN2D KO mice. Third, UBP145 inhibited a component of STP, termed STP2, in WT but not GluN2D KO mice. Taken together, these findings suggest an involvement for GluN2D-containing NMDARs in both STP and LTP in mouse hippocampus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".