Study on mechanism of carbonaceous gold ore during oxidation roasting by kinetics: phase transformation and structure evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The pretreatment and effective utilization of carbonaceous gold ore is of significant to refractory gold resources. In this work, the calcination kinetics was employed to investigate the relationship between phase transformation and structure evolution of carbonaceous gold ore during roasting process. Mechanism functions were determined and the fact that roasting process was controlled by chemical reaction in the initial 90 min and dominated by internal diffusion as time reached to 120 min was uncovered. In addition, the apparent activation energies for initial and latter roasting stage were 212.11 kJ·mol−1 and 163.73 kJ·mol−1, respectively. Combined with the analysis of phase transformation and structure evolution, the removal of carbonaceous matter and appearance of new tiny pores contributed to the change of calcination kinetics. Moreover, phase transformation and structure evolution were beneficial for elevating Au recovery during leaching experiment. These findings helped to understand the mechanism of carbonaceous minerals during roasting and provided new insight for the utilization of refractory gold resource.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".