MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206829594 · doi:10.1089/bio.2021.0083

Effectiveness of Clinical-Grade Chondroitin Sulfate and Ascorbic Acid in Mitigating Cryoprotectant Toxicity in Porcine Articular Cartilage

2021· article· en· W3206829594 on OpenAlexaff
Mary Crisol, Kar Wey Yong, Kezhou Wu, Leila Laouar, Janet A.W. Elliott, Nadr M. Jomha

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopreservation and Biobanking · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViability assayChondrocyteCryoprotectantToxicityAscorbic acidChondroitin sulfateVitrificationCartilageChemistryPharmacologyAndrologyMedicineCellBiochemistryCryopreservationFood scienceInternal medicineBiologyGlycosaminoglycanAnatomyEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High concentrations of cryoprotective agents (CPAs) are required to achieve successful vitrification of articular cartilage; however, CPA cytotoxicity causes chondrocyte death. To reduce CPA toxicity, supplementation with research-grade additives, in particular chondroitin sulfate (CS) and ascorbic acid (AA), have previously been shown to improve chondrocyte recovery and metabolic function after exposure to CPAs at hypothermic conditions. However, it is necessary to evaluate the pharmaceutical equivalent clinical grade of these additives to facilitate the supplementation of additives into future vitrification protocols, which will be designed for vitrifying human articular cartilage in tissue banks. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of clinical-grade CS, AA, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in mitigating toxicity to chondrocytes during CPA exposure and removal, and determine whether a combination of two additives would further improve chondrocyte viability. We hypothesized that clinical-grade additives would exert chondroprotective effects comparable to those of research-grade additives, and that this protective effect would be enhanced if two additives were combined when compared with a single additive. The results indicated that both clinical-grade and research-grade additives significantly improved cell viability (p < 0.10) compared with the negative control (CPA with no additives). CS, AA, and NAC+AA increased cell viability significantly (p < 0.10) compared with the negative control. However, NAC, NAC+CS, and CS+AA did not improve cell viability when compared with the negative control (p > 0.10). We demonstrated that supplementation with clinical-grade CS or AA significantly improved chondrocyte viability in porcine cartilage subjected to high CPA concentrations, whereas supplementation with clinical-grade NAC did not benefit chondrocyte viability. Supplementation with clinical-grade additives in CPA solutions can mitigate CPA toxicity, which will be important in translating previously developed effective protocols for the vitrification of articular cartilage to human tissue banks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopreservation and BiobankingSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207