THE RELATION OF LONG-SUFFERING FOR HYPERTENSION AND FRAILTY WITH COGNITIVE FUNCTION STATUS IN ELDERLY AT PSTW BUDI MULIA 2 CENGKARENG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increase in the elderly population in the world has resulted in an epidemiological transition in the health sector so that there can an increase in the number of morbidity due to degenerative diseases, namely cognitive function problems. Poor cognitive function status can influenced by one of the respondent's characteristic domains such as the length of history of hypertension and the domain of health risk factors such as frailty. This study aims to find the relationship between long-suffering from hypertension and frailty on cognitive function status in elderly patients at PSTW Budi Mulia 2 Cengkareng. The research design used is descriptive analytic with a cross-sectional approach. Collecting data using the questionnaire The Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) which have been test for validity and reliability. The sample consisted of 58 respondents who were take using purposive sampling technique. Data analysis used in this study is the Pearson correlation. This study shows that 81% of respondents are between 60-74 years old, female gender is 67.2%, primary school education level is 56.9%. Meanwhile, the length of the elderly suffering from hypertension ≤5 years was 65.5%, mild frailty was 67.2%, and moderate cognitive dysfunction was 36.2%. The results of the Pearson correlation statistical test showed that there was a relationship between the length of suffering from hypertension and the cognitive function status with a value of p = 0.004 and there was a relationship between frailty and the cognitive function status with a value of p = 0.001. Elderly advised to support health by controlling a low salt diet so that cognitive decline does not become chronic so that they do not develop dementia and control frailty by eating foods high in energy and protein so that they do not worsen cognitive function. Keywords: Frailty; Length of Suffering from Hypertension; Status of Cognitive Function
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".