Incorporating cross-voxel exchange into the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging data: theory, simulations and experimental results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Predictions of tumour perfusion are key determinants of drug delivery and responsiveness to therapy. Pharmacokinetic models allow for the estimation of perfusion properties of tumour tissues but many assume no dispersion associated with tracer transport away from the capillaries and through the tissue. At the level of a voxel, this translates to assuming no cross-voxel tracer exchange, often leading to the misinterpretation of derived perfusion parameters. Tofts model (TM), a compartmental model widely used in oncology, also makes this assumption. A more realistic description is required to quantify kinetic properties of tracers, such as convection and diffusion. We propose a Cross-Voxel Exchange Model (CVXM) for analysing cross-voxel tracer kinetics. In silico datasets quantifying the roles of convection and diffusion in tracer transport (which TM ignores) were employed to investigate the interpretation of Tofts’ perfusion parameters compared to CVXM. TM returned inaccurate values of K t r a n s and v e where diffusive and convective mechanisms are pronounced (up to 20% and 300% error respectively). A mathematical equation, developed in this work, predicts and gives the correct physiological interpretation of Tofts’ v e . Finally, transport parameters were derived from dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of a TS-415 human cervical carcinoma xenograft by using TM and CVXM. The latter deduced lower values of K t r a n s and v e compared to TM (lower by up to 63% and 76% respectively). It also allowed the detection of a diffusive flux (mean diffusivity 155 μ m 2 s −1 ) in the tumour tissue, as well as an increased convective flow at the periphery (mean velocity 2.3 μ m s −1 detected). The results serve as a proof of concept establishing the feasibility of using CVXM for accurately determining transport metrics that characterize the exchange of tracer between voxels. CVXM needs to be investigated further as its parameters can be linked to the tumour microenvironment properties (permeability, pressure…), potentially leading to enhanced personalized treatment planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".