MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3207028532 · doi:10.1093/jas/skab235.208

217 Comparative Effects of Dietary Methionine and Cysteine Supplementation on Redox Status and Intestinal Integrity in Immunologically Challenged-weaned Pigs

2021· article· en· W3207028532 on OpenAlexaff
Bonjin Koo, Chengbo Yang, Martin Nyachoti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJejunumGlutathioneMethionineInternal medicineChemistrySalineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceBiologyBiochemistryMedicineEnzymeAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim was to investigate the effects of dietary Met and Cys supplementation in immunologically challenged-weaned pigs. Forty weaned piglets (6.51 ± 0.29 kg) were randomly allocated to five treatments and fed the assigned diets for 9 days. The treatments included: (1) sham-challenged control (SCC), (2) challenged control (CC), (3) MET (CC + 0.1% DL-Met supplementation), (4) CYS (CC + 0.1% L-Cys supplementation), and (5) MET+CYS (CC + 0.1% DL-Met and 0.1% L-Cys supplementation). Piglets were intramuscularly injected with either lipopolysaccharides (LPS; 30 μg/kg) or saline solution on day 7. All data were analyzed using single degree of freedom contrasts in the mixed procedure of SAS to test the effect of LPS challenge, Met supplementation, Cys supplementation, and Met × Cys supplementation. The CC group had lower (P < 0.05) villi height and villi surface area and glutathione (GSH) concentration and higher (P < 0.05) flux of 4-kDa fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FD4) in the jejunum than SCC group. Dietary Cys supplementation increased (P < 0.05) villi surface area, GSH concentration and reduced GSH: oxidized GSH and decreased (P < 0.05) the flux of FD4 in the jejunum. Dietary Met supplementation enhanced (P < 0.05) hepatic GSH content. Pigs in the MET group had greater mRNA abundance of IL-6 and IL-10 (P < 0.05) and lower serum IL-8 concentration than those in the CC group. There were Met × Cys interactions (P < 0.05) in serum IL-4 and IL-8 concentrations and hepatic Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity. In conclusion, dietary L-Cys supplementation restored intestinal integrity and GSH concentration that were affected by LPS challenge. Dietary DL-Met supplementation improved hepatic GSH and reduced systemic inflammatory response, but antagonistic interaction with dietary Cys supplementation was observed in inflammatory response and redox status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→