MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207182579 · doi:10.1101/2021.10.19.465007

Genetic Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder Present Subtle Heterogenous Cardiac Abnormalities

2021· preprint· en· W3207182579 on OpenAlexaff
Stephania Assimopoulos, Christopher Hammill, Darren Fernandes, T. Leigh Spencer Noakes, Yuqing Zhou, Lauryl M. J. Nutter, Jacob Ellegood, Evdokia Anagnostou, John G. Sled, Jason P. Lerch

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalToronto Centre for PhenogenomicsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderCardiologyMutantCardiac function curveInternal medicineStroke volumeMedicineAutismBiologyHeart rateGeneticsGeneHeart failurePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) are strongly linked on a functional and genetic level. Most work has been focused on neurodevelopmental abnormalities in CHD. Conversely, cardiac abnormalities in ASD have been less studied. In this work we investigate the prevalence of cardiac comorbidities relative to genetic contributors of ASD. Methods Using high frequency ultrasound imaging, we screened 9 mouse models with ASD-related genetic alterations ( Arid1b (+/-) , Chd8 (+/-) , 16p11.2 (deletion), Sgsh (+/-) , Sgsh (-/-) , Shank3 Δexon 4-9 (+/-) , Shank3 Δexon 4-9 (-/-) , Fmr1 (-/-) , Vps13b (+/-) ), and pooled wild-type littermates (WT). Using a standardised imaging protocol, we measured heart rate (HR), aorta diameter (AoD), thickness and thickening of the left-ventricular (LV) anterior and posterior walls, LV chamber diameter, fractional shortening, stroke volume and cardiac output, Peak E and A velocity ratio of mitral inflow, Velocity Time Integral (VTI) through the ascending aorta. Results Mutant groups presented small-scale alterations in cardiac structure and function compared to WTs. A greater number of significant differences was observed among mutant groups than between mutant groups and WTs. Mutant groups differed primarily in measures of structure (LV chamber diameter and anterior wall thickness, HR, AoD). When compared to WTs, they differed in both structure and function (LV anterior wall thickness and thickening, chamber diameter and fractional shortening, HR). The mutant groups with most differences to WTs were 16p11.2 (deletion), Fmrl (-/-) , Arid1b (+/-) . Among mutant groups, the groups differing most from others were 16p11.2 (deletion), Sgsh (+/-) , Fmrl (-/-) . Our results broadly recapitulate the associated clinical findings. Limitations Various genetically driven cardiac abnormalities occur early in life, so repeating this work in non-adult mice may be valuable. To identify possible sex differences, we must extend this work to female mice. The downsampling procedure used (total correlation calculation) must be verified. Only indirect comparison between our results and clinical literature is possible due to differing study designs. Conclusions The characteristic heterogeneity of ASD was recapitulated in the observed cardiac phenotype. The type of measures (morphological, functional) mutant groups differ in can highlight common underlying mechanisms. Clinically, knowledge of cardiac abnormalities in ASD can be essential as even non-lethal cardiac abnormalities can impact normal development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207