MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Canada's Emergency Geomatics Service Near Real-Time Flood Mapping from Multi-Source Data

2021· article· en· W3207304724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ian Olthof, V Decker, Simon Tolszczuk-Leclerc, Victor Neufeld, Brad Lehrbass, Nicolas Svacina, T Rainville, Elise Bergeron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomaticsFlood mythRemote sensingDigital elevation modelFloodplainLidarGeographic information systemVegetation (pathology)GeocodingService (business)Computer scienceGeographyEnvironmental scienceCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Emergency Geomatics Service (EGS) creates and disseminates flood maps in near real time during major flood events. In 2017, the EGS developed and deployed a fully automated method to map open water and flooded vegetation using available optical and radar imagery. This method employs machine learning trained using historical inundation maps to classify open water followed by region growing to map flooded vegetation, and requires only a few sensor-specific parameters for different input satellite data. Recent collection of High-Resolution Digital Elevation Model (HRDEM) lidar data over important floodplains, in Canada, in combination with in-situ flood perimeter observations from an EGS-developed Citizen Geographic Information (CGI) mobile application or other sources, has facilitated the development of better urban flood mapping where traditional satellite-based methods fail. This presentation will describe existing operational EGS flood mapping methods with examples from previous activations, as well as new developments in urban flood mapping that will become operational depending on the availability ofrequired input data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207