MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Engineered feldspar-based ceramics: A review of their potential in ceramic industry

2021· review· en· W3207524144 on OpenAlexafffund
V. Fuertes, J.J. Reinosa, J.F. Fernández, E. Enríquez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Ceramic Society · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadUniversité Laval
KeywordsCeramicMaterials scienceFeldsparMineralogyMetallurgyGeologyQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feldspars are the most abundant mineral in the earth’s crust, however, their interest in ceramic industry goes beyond their abundancy. The unique compositional and structural features as well as the many outstanding properties that feldspars own, make them to be widely used as raw material for the ceramic industry. Moreover, multiple works have demonstrated that engineered feldspar-based ceramics are very promising for their use in applications such as ceramic tiles, dielectrics or phosphors, among others, and therefore, in this article, a comprehensive review on their dielectric, mechanical, optical and thermal properties is presented. This review intends to provide an up-to-date outlook of the possibilities that engineered feldspars offer to their application in ceramic industry, discussing future prospects and challenges that might ease the opening up of new horizons for future applications in ceramic sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Ceramic SocietySame topicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionFrench-language works237,207