MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207527902 · doi:10.14288/1.0400176

East Mall Redesign

2021· article· en· W3207527902 on OpenAlex
Francis L. K. Hsü, Lane Isaac, Ryan Keefe, Joshua Rea, Steve Sun, Evan Zenke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDiverse Legal and Medical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive, detailed design has been prepared for review in response to the University of British Columbia’s request for a complete redesign of the East Mall corridor. The section of East Mall under consideration is located between West 16th Avenue and Agronomy Road on the south side of campus. With guidance from the client, UBC SEEDS, the detailed design looks to revamp the corridor into a new and effective design with sustainability and functionality as core design principles. Furthering the concept of sustainability, a holistic approach of incorporating a bioswale, recycled road material, and environmental planning is used. To address the functionality and concerns raised by UBC SEEDS, designers incorporated the use of road geometry, traffic calming, bus stops, drop-off zones, traffic analysis, pavement, signage, and canopy designs. Through these design elements, designers look to promote sustainable modes of traffic such as foot traffic, public transit, and cycling by making the corridor more livable for users. To ensure that the detailed design is logistically feasible, designers considered the impact on the community, the environmental management, maintenance over the life cycle, construction methodology/schedule, and cost. The ultimate result of the detailed design is a construction start date of May 1st, 2021 and a completion date of October 6th, 2021, which will be broken down into different construction phases. The project's total estimated cost is expected to be $9,102,000+tax, which includes all design and support costs. The design team is excited to present the detailed design of the East Mall redesign project. It is with the utmost pride to have been selected and afforded the opportunity to contribute to the University of British Columbia’s community. The team looks forward to assisting with the project as it moves towards the construction phase to ensure this project comes to fruition. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it