East Mall Redesign
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comprehensive, detailed design has been prepared for review in response to the University of British Columbia’s request for a complete redesign of the East Mall corridor. The section of East Mall under consideration is located between West 16th Avenue and Agronomy Road on the south side of campus. With guidance from the client, UBC SEEDS, the detailed design looks to revamp the corridor into a new and effective design with sustainability and functionality as core design principles. Furthering the concept of sustainability, a holistic approach of incorporating a bioswale, recycled road material, and environmental planning is used. To address the functionality and concerns raised by UBC SEEDS, designers incorporated the use of road geometry, traffic calming, bus stops, drop-off zones, traffic analysis, pavement, signage, and canopy designs. Through these design elements, designers look to promote sustainable modes of traffic such as foot traffic, public transit, and cycling by making the corridor more livable for users. To ensure that the detailed design is logistically feasible, designers considered the impact on the community, the environmental management, maintenance over the life cycle, construction methodology/schedule, and cost. The ultimate result of the detailed design is a construction start date of May 1st, 2021 and a completion date of October 6th, 2021, which will be broken down into different construction phases. The project's total estimated cost is expected to be $9,102,000+tax, which includes all design and support costs. The design team is excited to present the detailed design of the East Mall redesign project. It is with the utmost pride to have been selected and afforded the opportunity to contribute to the University of British Columbia’s community. The team looks forward to assisting with the project as it moves towards the construction phase to ensure this project comes to fruition. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.171 | 0.071 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".