Continual Learning Using Lattice-Free MMI for Speech Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continual learning (CL), or domain expansion, recently became a popular topic for automatic speech recognition (ASR) acoustic modeling because practical systems have to be updated frequently in order to work robustly on types of speech not observed during initial training. While sequential adaptation allows tuning a system to a new domain, it may result in performance degradation on the old domains due to catastrophic forgetting. In this work we explore regularization-based CL for neural network acoustic models trained with the lattice-free maximum mutual information (LF-MMI) criterion. We simulate domain expansion by incrementally adapting the acoustic model on different public datasets that include several accents and speaking styles. We investigate two well-known CL techniques, elastic weight consolidation (EWC) and learning without forgetting (LWF), which aim to reduce forgetting by preserving model weights or network outputs. We additionally introduce a sequence-level LWF regularization, which exploits posteriors from the denominator graph of LF-MMI to further reduce forgetting. Empirical results show that the proposed sequence-level LWF can improve the best average word error rate across all domains by up to 9.4% relative compared with using regular LWF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".