The Influence of Internal and External Factors on NPF And NPL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><em>Indonesia has two types of bank, islamic banking and conventional banking. In their activities, banks are often facing any risks, named financing risk (NPF) in the islamic banking and credit risk (NPL) in the conventional banking. Based on data by OJK, the value of NPF is always higher than NPL. However, in January-August 2020 the NPF tended to decrease while the NPL tended to increase, even indicating a movement that would excited the NPF value. Therefore, it's necessary to the research of the factors that influence both NPF and NPL, including the internal and external conditions of the bank. The data that used as reference is the secondary data from OJK of 10 both islamic and conventional commercial banks from the first quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2020. Furthermore, the data is analyzed with panel model fixed effect data analysis with the robust standard error estimation method and panels corrected standard error (PCSE cross-sectional SUR). By using 5% of significance level, this research results that NPF is only significantly and positively influenced by FDR. However, NPL is significantly and negatively affected by the inflation and ROA, also significantly and positively influenced by CAR, LDR, and BOPO.</em></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it