MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207666017 · doi:10.26685/urncst.268

Determining the Differences in Acute Phase of Astrocytic Activation Between Male and Female Rats – A Research Protocol

2021· article· en· W3207666017 on OpenAlexaff
Yaqian Grace Zhang, Sumin Lee, Rachel Chin

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlial fibrillary acidic proteinTraumatic brain injuryAstrocyteGliosisBlast injuryMedicinePoison controlPhysiologyInternal medicinePathologyCentral nervous systemImmunohistochemistryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Primary blast injuries are a common cause of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and are the leading cause of both closed and open-skull brain injuries. Following mTBI, astrocytic activation and reactive gliosis occur which results in an upregulation of various astrocytic markers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). These markers can act as biomarkers for patients with mTBI. This protocol will examine how primary blast injury affects the acute phase of astrocytic activation in male and female rats. Rationale: This experiment will determine the sex differences in astrocytic activation after male and female rodent mTBI to replicate the effects of primary blast injury resulting from improvised explosive device (IED) impact in humans. These injuries are the most common cause of concussions in deployed military personnel. Understanding sex differences in the extent of astrocytic activation and the time window between blast impact and initial activation will have implications for trauma treatment in the field to prevent excessive neurodegeneration. There is also a lack of research on the sex-specific acute astrocytic activation resulting from blast injuries. Methods: Adult male and female wild-type Sprague Dawley rats will be randomly assigned to (a) male sham, (b) female sham, (c) male mTBI, or (d) female mTBI group. After each rat is exposed to the primary blast injury, coronal sections of the brains will be collected. Flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) will be used to analyze astrocytic gene expression. Expected Results: For the 48-hour duration following primary blast injuries, GFAP levels are expected to increase to different extents for both males and females. We expect this difference between males and females to occur due to hormonal suppression of astrogliosis in females. Discussion: The analysis of astrocytic activation among female and male rats caused by closed skull blast-specific injury will help to determine sex-specific treatments and therapeutic applications for injured military soldiers. Conclusion: This study will allow for a greater understanding of sex differences in astrocytic activation, which may benefit treatment plans for mTBI patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207