MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207735725

Entanglement and correlations in $z=2$ Lifshitz theories under wavefunction renormalization group flow

2021· preprint· en· W3207735725 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Boudreault, Clément Berthière, William Witczak‐Krempa

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum entanglementPhysicsWave functionQuantum mechanicsCentral chargeRenormalization groupConformal field theoryMathematical physicsConformal mapConformal symmetryQuantumMathematicsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starting from the $(d+1)$-dimensional Lifshitz critical boson with dynamical exponent $z=2$, we propose two nontrivial deformations that preserve the Rokhsar-Kivelson structure where the groundstate is encoded in an underlying, local $d$-dimensional QFT. Specializing to $d=1$ spatial dimension, the first deformation maps the groundstate to the quantum harmonic oscillator, leading to a gap for the scalar. We study the resulting correlation functions, and find that Cluster Decomposition is restored. The special form of the groundstate allows to analytically compute the $c$-function for the entanglement entropy along a renormalization group (RG) flow for the wavefunction, which is found to be strictly decreasing as in conformal field theories (CFTs). From the entropic $c$-function, we obtain the corner term for the $z=2$ Lifshitz critical boson in (2+1)D in the small angle limit. The second deformation is non-Gaussian and yields a groundstate described by $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$-conformal quantum mechanics. This deformation preserves the conformal spatial symmetry of the groundstate, and constrains the form of the correlators and entanglement entropy. As a byproduct of our calculations, we obtain explicit results for the capacity of entanglement in Lifshitz theories and discuss their interpretation. We also prove the separability of the reduced density matrix of two disconnected subsystems for real-valued RK wavefunctions, implying the vanishing of logarithmic negativity. Finally, we comment on the relations to certain stoquastic quantum spin chains, the Motzkin and Fredkin chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207