From Ancient to Modern: Constitutionalism in Canada: De l’ancien au moderne : le constitutionnalisme au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English As a consequence of the introduction of the Constitution Act, Canadian constitutionalism evolved substantively and institutionally. Substantively, the Constitution acquired novel features in becoming codified, supreme, individualized, and entrenched. Institutionally, in part as an effect of these substantive changes, the Constitution came to symbolize the state, advise authorities, constrain cabinet, and legitimize legislation where, in the past, the Crown had primarily fulfilled these sociopolitical institutional functions. These substantive and institutional changes demonstrate how Canada’s constitution evolved from its ancient origins toward modern constitutionalism as a result of Patriation. Francais A la suite de l’adoption de la Loi constitutionnelle, le constitutionnalisme canadien a evolue sur le plan du contenu et des institutions. Sur le fond, la Constitution a acquis de nouvelles caracteristiques en devenant codifiee, supreme, individualisee et enracinee. Sur le plan institutionnel, en partie a cause de ces changements de fond, la Constitution en est venue a symboliser l’Etat, a conseiller les autorites, a contraindre le cabinet et a legitimer la legislation alors que, par le passe, la Couronne avait principalement rempli ces fonctions institutionnelles sociopolitiques. Ces changements substantiels et institutionnels demontrent comment la constitution du Canada a evolue de ses origines anciennes vers un constitutionnalisme moderne a la suite du rapatriement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".