Interpolating GPR data using anti‐alias singular spectrum analysis (SSA) method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ground Penetrating Radar data are often acquired along profiles employing bistatic equipment with a fixed distance between the transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) antennae. Even in cases where more than two antennae are used, the number of channels tends to be relatively small, resulting in either a limited number of offsets or gathers with inadequate far offsets. Estimating stacking velocity and performing migration from this type of datasets are difficult. In this paper, we present techniques to interpolate both aliased and non‐aliased datasets in the offset domain and the common‐midpoint domain. The latter permits us to increase the fold of the survey and consequently improve the process of velocity analysis and migration. We assess the reconstruction efficiency of the interpolator using both synthetic and real data to different degrees of decimating. In both cases, the unaliased version of both datasets provides an accurate solution for a careful comparative analysis. At the end of this work, we make a further comparison between the resulting migrated and stacked sections for both the original and reconstructed datasets in order to highlight the efficiency of the interpolation algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it