MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207880931 · doi:10.1159/000518977

Efficacy of Mitomycin C Combined with Direct Vision Internal Urethrotomy for Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021· review· en· W3207880931 on OpenAlex
Chunru Xu, Zhenpeng Zhu, Lanruo Lin, Tongde Lv, Tianyu Cai, Jian Lin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUrologia Internationalis · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisMitomycin CUrethrotomyUrethral strictureSurgeryUrethraUrologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The high recurrence of a urethral stricture after direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) has been a problem for years. Mitomycin C (MMC) is an excellent antifibrosis antigen that has been used in many fields, but its effect on a urethral stricture remains controversial. The purpose of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of MMC in reducing the recurrence rate of a urethral stricture after the first urethrotomy. METHODS: Common databases were searched for publications prior to November 30, 2020. Randomized controlled and cohort trials were all included. Recurrence and success rates after the first urethrotomy of the posterior urethra were the main outcomes. Revman 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Two evaluation systems, the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, were used to examine the risk of bias for RCTs and all studies. The quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation standard. RESULTS: Sixteen trials were included, the reporting quality of which was generally poor, and the evidence level was very low to moderate. The addition of MMC could significantly reduce the recurrence rate of urethral strictures (risk ratio [RR] = 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26, 0.67; p = 0.0002; 9 trials; 550 participants). The results of the subgroup analysis suggested that the effect of MMC combined with DVIU was significant in short (≤2 cm) anterior urethral strictures (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.78; p = 0.008), >12-month follow-up (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.76; p = 0.003). It also increased the success rate of the first urethrotomy procedure for posterior urethral contracture (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.84; p < 0.00001; 7 trials; 342 participants). Low-dose local injection of MMC was the most commonly used method. CONCLUSION: MMC combined with DVIU is a promising way to reduce the long-term recurrence rate of a short-segment anterior urethral stricture. It also increases the success rate of the first urethrotomy of the posterior urethra. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it