MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207889613 · doi:10.1002/hep.32199

Genome‐wide analysis identifies gallstone‐susceptibility loci including genes regulating gastrointestinal motility

2021· review· en· W3207889613 on OpenAlexaff
Cameron J. Fairfield, Thomas M Drake, Riinu Pius, Andrew D. Bretherick, Archie Campbell, David W. Clark, Jonathan Fallowfield, Caroline Hayward, Neil C. Henderson, Andrii Iakovliev, Peter K. Joshi, Nicholas L. Mills, David J. Porteous, Prakash Ramachandran, Robert K. Semple, Catherine A. Shaw, Cathie L. W. Sudlow, Paul R. H. J. Timmers, James F. Wilson, Stephen J. Wigmore, Athina Spiliopoulou, Ewen M. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersMedical Research CouncilAcademy of Medical SciencesScottish Funding CouncilBritish Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyBiologyGeneticsInternal medicineGenetic associationMendelian randomizationOdds ratioSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeBioinformaticsGeneMedicineGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several risk loci for gallstone disease. As with most polygenic traits, it is likely that many genetic determinants are undiscovered. The aim of this study was to identify genetic variants that represent new targets for gallstone research and treatment. Approach and Results We performed a GWAS of 28,627 gallstone cases and 348,373 controls in the UK Biobank, replicated findings in a Scottish cohort (1089 cases, 5228 controls), and conducted a GWA meta‐analysis (43,639 cases, 506,798 controls) with the FinnGen cohort. We assessed pathway enrichment using gene‐based then gene‐set analysis and tissue expression of identified genes in Genotype‐Tissue Expression project data. We constructed a polygenic risk score (PRS) and evaluated phenotypic traits associated with the score. Seventy‐five risk loci were identified ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ), of which 46 were new. Pathway enrichment revealed associations with lipid homeostasis, glucuronidation, phospholipid metabolism, and gastrointestinal motility. Anoctamin 1 ( ANO1 ) and transmembrane Protein 147 ( TMEM147 ), both in novel, replicated loci, are expressed in the gallbladder and gastrointestinal tract. Both regulate gastrointestinal motility. The gallstone risk allele rs7599‐A leads to suppression of hepatic TMEM147 expression, suggesting that the protein protects against gallstone formation. The highest decile of the PRS demonstrated a 6‐fold increased odds of gallstones compared with the lowest decile. The PRS was strongly associated with increased body mass index, serum liver enzymes, and C‐reactive protein concentrations, and decreased lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. Conclusions This GWAS demonstrates the polygenic nature of gallstone risk and identifies 46 novel susceptibility loci. We implicate genes influencing gastrointestinal motility in the pathogenesis of gallstones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatologySame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207