MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3207936442 · doi:10.1093/jas/skab235.151

154 Virulence Potential of Antimicrobial Resistant Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli from Poultry in a Caenorhabditis Elegans Model

2021· article· en· W3207936442 on OpenAlexaff
Chongwu Yang, Moussa S. Diarra, Muhammad Attiq Rehman, Linyan Li, Hai Yu, Xianhua Yin, Mueen Aslam, Catherine D. Carrillo, Chengbo Yang, Joshua Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirulenceBiologyCaenorhabditis elegansSerotypeFecesMicrobiologyEscherichia coliAntimicrobialGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigated virulence potential of poultry antimicrobial resistant extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). A total of 46 E. coli isolates from poultry meat, feces, or humans were sequenced and identified as ExPEC. Based on their characteristics, eight of these ExPEC isolates were evaluated for their potentials using a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. The life-span of C. elegans in response to these eight isolates was examined in three life-span experiments: 1) E. coli OP 50 (negative control), K88+ enterotoxigenic E. coli strain JG280 (positive control), and an ExPEC isolate from human urinal tract infection; 2) three ExPEC isolates from chicken and turkey retail meats; 3) four ExPEC isolates from chicken feces with different antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles or a various number of virulence genes (VGs). All 46 isolates belonged to 24 serotypes among which 6 were of serotype O25:H4 Sequence Type 131 (ST131). Interestingly, all ST 131 isolates from chicken or turkey retail meats clustered with a human UTI isolate belonging to the similar serotype and ST type. The types and numbers of AGRs and VGs varied among the eight selected isolates for C. elegans model. The human ExPEC induced a similar effect as the JG280 on reducing (P < 0.05) survival of C. elegans. Interestingly, chicken and turkey meat ExPEC isolates, caused similar negative impacts on the survival of worms as the human ExPEC. Additionally, fecal ExPEC isolates reduced (P < 0.05) the survival of C. elegans compared to OP50. However, the survival of C. elegans was not reduced with an increasing number of VGs and did not seem to be affected by AMR profiles. This study indicated the virulence potential of ExPEC isolates from retail poultry meat or feces. The relationship between specific AMR profiles and/or numbers of VGs with pathogenicity in these E. coli isolates deserves further investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety→French-language works237,207→