157 Starch and Dry Matter Digestibility Values Are Not Associated with Improved Growth and Feed Efficiency in Weanling Pigs Fed a Therapeutic Multi-antimicrobial-supplemented Diet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The porcine terminal small intestinal starch digestive activity and capacity undergo further developmental changes during the acute and adaptive weaning transition. Objective of this study was to address the hypothesis that weanling porcine growth promotion associated with therapeutic antimicrobials was mediated via improving intestinal starch digestion. A total of 170 crossbred barrows (n = 34 pens; 5 barrows/pen), weaned on d 19–21 with an average initial BW of 6.9±0.1 kg, were randomly assigned to two dried whey, corn and SBM-based diets, i.e., control vs. antimicrobials, for 21 d according to a randomized complete block design. The therapeutic multi-antimicrobial diet was supplemented with aureomycin 220, tiamulin 31.2 and ZnO 2,358 at mg/kg diet. The apparent ileal, cecal and total tract digestibility values of total starch and DM were determined by using the titanium dioxide as the digestibility marker (0.30% in the diets). There were no differences (P > 0.05) in the starch digestibility at the ileal (control, 98.3±0.9% vs. antimicrobials, 98.3±0.5%), cecal (control, 96.3±0.6% vs. antimicrobials, 97.1±0.6%) and total tract (control, 98.5±0.3% vs. antimicrobials, 98.7±0.3%) levels between the two diets. Furthermore, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the DM digestibility at the ileal (control, 75.7±2.2% vs. antimicrobials, 72.7±2.0%), cecal (control, 80.6±1.2% vs. antimicrobials, 81.3±1.2%) and total tract (control, 85.8±0.8% vs. antimicrobials, 84.7±0.9%) levels between the two diets. The Spearman’s correlation analyses revealed no significant associations (P > 0.05) between the growth performance endpoints of ADG, ADFI and F: G and the digestibility values of total starch and DM at the levels of ileal, cecal and total tract. Our results suggest that starch is near complete digestion at the distal small intestine, thus not limiting growth and feed conversion efficiency of weanling pigs fed corn and SBM-based diets. Hence, therapeutic multi-antimicrobial effects are unlikely channeled through modulating digestive utilization efficiency of starch and DM in weanling pigs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".