Linearized Homotopy Perturbation Method for Two Nonlinear Problems of Duffing Equations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the paper, we solve two nonlinear problems related to the Duffing equations in space and in time. The first problem is the bifurcation of Duffing equation in space, wherein a critical value of the parameter initiates the bifurcation from a trivial solution to a non-trivial solution. The second problem is an unconventional periodic problem of Duffing equation in time to determine period and periodic solution. To save computational cost and even enhance the accuracy in seeking higher order analytic solutions of these two problems, a modified homotopy perturbation method is invoked after a linearization technique being exerted on the Duffing equation, whose nonlinear cubic term is decomposed at two sides via a weight factor, such that the Duffing equation is linearized as the Mathieu type differential equation. The constant preceding the displacement is expanded in powers of homotopy parameter and the coefficients are determined to avoid secular solutions appeared in the derived sequence of linear differential equations. Consequently, after setting the homotopy parameter equal to unity and solving the amplitude equation, the higher order bifurcated solutions can be derived explicitly. For the second problem, we can determine the period and periodic solution in closed-form, which are very accurate. For the sake of comparison the results obtained from the fourth-order Runge-Kutta numerical method are used to evaluate the presented analytic solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it