Allelopathic effects of native and exotic <i>Prosopis</i> congeners in Petri dishes and potting soils: assessment of the congeneric approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The congeneric approach assesses the relative role of exotic invasive plants compared to native plants on associated species. However, most studies on seed germination have been conducted in Petri dishes that do not reflect natural soil conditions. Here, we compared the effects of different litter extracts of the exotics Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. and Prosopis pallida (Willd.) Kunth, as well as native Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce, on seed germination and seedling dry weight of two weedy plants (Amaranthus graecizans L. and Sisymbrium irio L.) and the native Senecio flavus (Decne.) Sch.Bip. in both Petri dishes and potted soil experiments. The results indicate that non-treated seeds (control) of the three species attained more than 95% germination in the Petri dishes (in vitro). The increase in the litter concentrations of both invasive Prosopis species inhibited the native Senecio flavus germination and significantly reduced germination and seedling weight of the weedy A. graecizans and Sisymbrium irio. Nevertheless, the native P. cineraria extracts had significant depressive effects on seed germination and seedling growth of the native Senecio flavus but limited effects on the weedy A. graecizans and Sisymbrium irio. The results support a greater impact of exotic than native congener on native plants. To better assess allelopathic effects, it is recommended to not rely on germination in Petri dishes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".