MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208109069 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2063_25

Driving and managing stress in the Deep Mill Level Zone caving mine

2020· article· en· W3208109069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Mining engineeringMillGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) panel cave mine in PT Freeport Indonesia continues to ramp up production since initial undercutting began in 2015. At approximately 1,500 m below surface, the DMLZ is one of the world’s deepest caving operations. The current undercut area has reached 60,000 m2, within a 1,200 m triangular-shaped perimeter. This deep mining environment has given rise to substantial pre-mining and induced loading conditions. Stress management in production areas represents the toughest challenge to date for the operation. In addition to applying lessons learned from the overlying Intermediate Ore Zone (IOZ) and Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) mines, extensive empirical ground response data has been collected from undercut and extraction levels. The understanding of how the various geological, geotechnical and mine design criteria interact has resulted in a much-improved approach towards DMLZ stress management. The most notable successes related to DMLZ stress management include improved understanding of ground response, accelerated cave growth, and increased production rates. This paper summarizes the key learnings regarding stress management in production areas and outlines positive improvements undertaken towards sustained, safe caving in the DMLZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it