MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fingerprint of novel circulating microRNAs identify patients with stroke-embolic stroke of undetermined source

2021· article· en· W3208159065 on OpenAlexaff
Ceren Eyileten, Zofia Wicik, Joanna Jarosz-Popek, Pamela Czajka, Alex Fitas, Marta Wolska, A Nowak, Daniel Jakubik, Marek Postuła, Guillaume Paré, Salvatore De Rosa, Anna Członkowska, Dagmara Mirowska-Guzeł

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Logistic regressionInternal medicineMann–Whitney U testmicroRNAOncologyBioinformaticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Stroke is the second-most common cause of death worldwide. Circulating levels of selected microRNAs (miRNAs) were found to be modulated both in animal experimental models and in patients with stroke, opening up new avenues for the identification of more effective and specific biomarkers to identify and risk-stratify stroke patients. Aim of the present study is to identify all circulating miRNAs that are modulated in patients with stroke, to select specific miRNAs to be used as disease biomarkers to improve prognosis. Methods 48 patients with stroke- ESUS were involved in the study. We have divided the patient groups based on patients who had a second stroke or TIA and did not have (safety vs safety control). Total RNA was extracted from plasma samples quality of extracted material was assessed using a fluorometric electrophoretic assay. MiRNA profiling was performed using the Affymetrix platform using. Statistical analysis was performed in TAC software. Additional analyses were performed in and R using Signal information obtained from the TAC output. We performed the following tests using log2 transformed data and all comparison groups (A-F). We performed additional FDR correction, logistic regression, Mann-whitney test t-test depending if variances were equal or differing. We calculated Area under the curve using ROCp R package. Scores were ranging from 0–1. Co-expression analysis to identify genes authentically expressed was performed using Spearman correlation (cutoff=0.9, Rpval=0.05). In order to identify the targets of DE miRNAs we used our wizbionet R package and previously developed pipelines [1,2]. We performed target screening using multimiR package, selecting top 20% predictions from all available databases. Results MiR-4786, miR-1205, miR-548ar-3p and miR-518e-3p were found the most differentially expressed miRNAs between the groups. So far, miR-4786 was studied only in patients with acute leukemia [3]. Several studies showed the importance of miR-1205 in cell carcinoma and ovarian cancer progression [4]. Moreover, so far only one study showed the regulation of miR-548ar-3p in breast cancer [5]. Finally only one study showed the alteration of miR-518e-3p in Parkinsons disease patients [6]. Besides, our enrichment analysis showed Interleukin-2 signaling pathway, Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, BDNF signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, Intellectual Disability, Alzheimer's Disease are significantly related to ESUS- patients. Conclusions Any of those miRNAs were never studied in stroke before, our results identified several novel circulating prognostic biomarkers miRNAs that are down- of up-regulated in ESUS-stroke patients (who had only one vs multiple stroke). Among those several miRNAs were identified that are known to play a role in the pathophysiology of neurovascular diseases, paving the way to a new class of smart pathophysiology-based biomarkers in stroke. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Polish National Science Center OPUS Figure 1Figure 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→