The Compounding Nature of Transitions in Dementia: Nursing Implications to Promote Dignity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transitions in older age can be fraught with challenges for older adults and their families. In particular, a diagnosis of dementia – as a transition in and of itself – can lead to multiple transitions. Within this paper, we present a case study of a couple in which the wife is diagnosed with dementia, and the resultant transitions which follow for the wife, husband, and adult daughter. The case study provides a background of the tremendous difficulties that arise with a diagnosis of dementia, becoming a caregiver, and the precariousness of the caregiver role when health changes occur, resulting in a transition to a care facility. Psychosocial and existential responses in relation to a diagnosis of dementia, becoming a caregiver, and transitioning to a facility are discussed. Challenges in navigating the healthcare system are addressed that may diminish a sense of personhood for those with dementia, as well as nursing implications arepresented. In particular, we discuss nursing implications of discourses in dementia care, as well as ethical issues of balancing the wishes of caregivers and individuals with dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".