Natural History of Leigh Syndrome: A Study of Disease Burden and Progression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This observational cohort study aims to quantify disease burden over time, establish disease progression rates, and identify factors that may determine the disease course of Leigh syndrome. Methods Seventy‐two Leigh syndrome children who completed the Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) at baseline at 3.7 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.0–7.6) and follow‐up assessments at 7.5 years (IQR = 3.7–11.0) in clinics were enrolled. Eighty‐two percent of this cohort had a confirmed genetic diagnosis, with pathogenic variants in the MT‐ATP6 and SURF1 genes being the most common cause. The total NPMDS scores denoted mild (0–14), moderate (15–25), and severe (>25) disease burden. Detailed clinical, neuroradiological, and molecular genetic findings were also analyzed. Results The median total NPMDS scores rose significantly ( Z = −6.9, p < 0.001), and the percentage of children with severe disease burden doubled (22% → 42%) over 2.6 years of follow‐up. Poor function (especially mobility, self‐care, communication, feeding, and education) and extrapyramidal features contributed significantly to the disease burden ( τ b ≈ 0.45–0.68, p < 0.001). These children also deteriorated to wheelchair dependence (31% → 57%), exclusive enteral feeding (22% → 46%), and one‐to‐one assistance for self‐care (25% → 43%) during the study period. Twelve children (17%) died after their last NPMDS scores were recorded. These children had higher follow‐up NPMDS scores (disease burden; p < 0.001) and steeper increase in NPMDS score per annum (disease progression; p < 0.001). Other predictors of poor outcomes include SURF1 gene variants ( p < 0.001) and bilateral caudate changes on neuroimaging ( p < 0.01). Interpretation This study has objectively defined the disease burden and progression of Leigh syndrome. Our analysis has also uncovered potential influences on the trajectory of this neurodegenerative condition. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:117–130
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".