S3098 Large Gastric Mass Found to Be a Rare Benign Tumor Called Inflammatory Fibroid Polyp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: A rare entity found mostly in the submucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, inflammatory fibroid polyps (IFP) can grow very large yet cause minimal symptoms and are known to make up only 0.1% of gastric polyps. We present a case on a removal of a 5 cm IFP causing minimal symptoms. Case Description/Methods: A 71-year-old African American male with a past medical history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia presented with a long-standing history of microcytic anemia with a baseline hemoglobin of 4.5. The patient denied any symptoms of occult bleeding. EGD showed a pedunculated polyp in the antrum of the stomach. The polyp was removed via a hot snare and the specimen was sent to the pathology lab for further testing. The pathology report showed the polyp was a circumscribed mesenchymal tumor involving mucosa and submucosa, measuring 5 cm. It was composed of bland spindled cells with mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate, including eosinophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. Onion skin proliferation around vessels was also documented. The spindle cells were positive for immunohistochemical marker CD34, and negative for S100, CD117, desmin, pancytokeratin, and SOX-10. Molecular evaluation of the polyp detected a mutation in the PDGFRA (platelet-derived growth factor alpha). These findings are consistent with the diagnosis of inflammatory fibroid polyp. Discussion: The cause of IFPs are largely unknown and most are asymptomatic. Larger polyps, however, can be associated with gastric outlet obstruction, intussusception, early satiety, or anemia. Our patient’s presentation was either asymptomatic or overshadowed by his diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and long-standing microcytic anemia. Discovery of the gastric polyp was incidental while trying to locate a source of bleeding via upper endoscopy. There were several differentials to consider in addition to IFPs, such as GISTs, other spindle cell tumors, or inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. However, these differentials were ruled out with immunohistochemical staining as well as clinical presentation. Treatment for IFPs has largely been surgical or by endoscopic resection, as there is a low rate of recurrence. One of our patient’s main medical problems continues to be microcytic anemia. Interestingly, there have been cases where anemia is largely resolved by the resection of an IFP. Our patient will have to be monitored to determine if his IFP played a role in his anemic condition.Figure 1.: Figure A - Endoscopic view of mass Figure B - CD117 Negative Figure C - S-100 Positive Figure D - Sox1 Positive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".