MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S766 Biologic Therapy in Patients With Perianal Crohn’s Disease and Association With Long-Term Rates of Surgical and Clinical Outcomes

2021· article· en· W3208288359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Gubatan, Spencer Frost, Steven Levitte, Kian Keyashian

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabVedolizumabCrohn's diseaseInternal medicinePerianal AbscessAdalimumabRetrospective cohort studyAbscessInfliximabSurgeryInflammatory bowel diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Perianal Crohn’s disease (pCD) represents an aggressive phenotype with limited studies on long-term outcomes. We evaluated long-term outcomes of these patients on biologics at the time of perianal disease diagnosis and the association of type of biologic use after first anti-TNF failure. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with pCD at a tertiary medical center through December 2020. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate rates and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of outcomes. Results: We included 311 patients with pCD (31 patients with ulcers, 72 with fissures, 236 with abscesses, and 262 with fistulas) of which 168 patients were on biologics (138 anti-TNF, 14 vedolizumab, 16 ustekinumab) at time of perianal disease diagnosis. At 5-year follow-up, biologic use (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab) at time of perianal disease diagnosis was not associated with overall rates of any surgical intervention compared to no biologics. Anti-TNF use at time of diagnosis was associated with decreased rates of perianal abscess recurrence at 5 years (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.74), whereas ustekinumab use was associated with increased rates of perianal fistula closure (HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.04- 12.35) and decreased rates of perianal abscess recurrence (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07- 0.56). Among patients who failed anti-TNF, switching to another anti-TNF was associated with decreased rates of colectomy (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.90) and permanent diversion (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.94) compared to ustekinumab, whereas vedolizumab use was associated with decreased rates of perianal fistula closure (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.96) compared to ustekinumab. In multivariate analysis, baseline BMI (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P = 0.037), presence of perianal abscess (OR 10.37, 95% CI 4.45-24.14, P < 0.0001), perianal fistula (OR 5.50, 95% CI 2.47-12.25, P < 0.0001), and antibiotic use (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.31-5.07, P = 0.006) were independently associated with increased odds of any surgical intervention at 5 years. Predictors of colectomy and permanent diversion at 5 years among patients with pCD included colonic disease (Montreal L2) and anal stenosis. Conclusion: Anti-TNF and ustekinumab use at time of perianal disease diagnosis is associated with improved long-term outcomes. Among pCD patients who fail anti-TNF, switching to another anti-TNF may be more favorable to ustekinumab, whereas switching to ustekinumab may be more favorable to vedolizumab with regards to long-term outcomes.Figure 1.: Clinical Characteristics of IMDC Stratified by Treatment of the Initial IMDC Event.Table 1.: Baseline Demographics and Persistence of Tofacitinib Treatment in the OLE Study for Pts who Enrolled With a Clinical Response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicAnorectal Disease Treatments and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207