MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208297092 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.121

O-277 Solar UVR exposure among outdoor workers in Alberta: Measurements and protective behaviours

2021· article· en· W3208297092 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cheryl Peters, Ela Rydz, Andrew Harper, Brandon Leong, Victoria H Arrandale, Sunil Kalia, Thomas Tenkate, Lindsay Forsman-Phillips, D. Linn Holness

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordssedEnvironmental healthMedicineSunlightOccupational safety and healthPersonal protective equipmentOccupational exposureDemographicsEnvironmental scienceToxicologyDemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Workplace solar UVR exposure has significant health and economic impacts. However, occupational exposure and sun protection behaviour data are scarcely available. <h3>Objectives</h3> This study aimed to characterize outdoor workers’ full-day solar UVR exposures and their determinants, as well as the prevalence and determinants of sun protection behaviours used at work and leisure. <h3>Methods</h3> We collected personal dosimetry measurements over one week using calibrated, electronic UVR dosimeters, and outdoor workers’ demographics, skin cancer risk factors, job information, and sun habits at work and leisure using self-completed questionnaires. Workers’ mean daily solar UVR exposure (standard erythemal dose, SED), corrected for repeated measurements, was summarized, and determinants of exposure were assessed using marginal models. The frequency of specific protective behaviours at leisure and work was compared. Sun protection scores were calculated, and the determinants of these scores for both settings were modelled using multiple linear regression. <h3>Results</h3> We recruited 179 workers and collected 883 full-day measurements. The mean dose among all workers was 1.9 SED (range: 0.03–16.6). Nearly half of all measurements exceeded the recommended international limit (1.3 SED). Landscape and maintenance workers (2.6 SED), and trade and recreation workers (1.8 SED) had the highest mean exposures. Job title, dosimeter placement, forecast, and hours spent outside were predictors of daily SED. At work, wearing a sleeved shirt (81% often/always) and hat (73%) were most prevalent, while seeking shade (12%) and applying sunscreen (36%) were least prevalent. Sun protection scores were higher at work than leisure. Hours spent outdoors was a strong determinant for the work and leisure models. Additional leisure model predictors were eye colour, sex, skin type, and job group. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Outdoor workers are exposed to high solar UVR levels and use different sun protective behaviours at work and leisure. These findings can inform future monitoring studies and exposure reduction initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOral PresentationsSame topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207